CIPS L5M1 Dumps - Pass Managing Teams and Individuals Exam in 2026

The human relations approach to management developed in the 1930s and 1940s as a reaction against earlier mechanistic approaches such as Taylorism and bureaucracy. It emphasises that employees are not just motivated by money and rules, but also by social needs, relationships, and recognition. The approach highlights the importance of communication, teamwork, leadership style, and employee well-being in achieving organisational success.

The foundation of this school came from the Hawthorne Studies (Elton Mayo), which showed that productivity improved not just because of physical conditions, but because workers felt valued and observed. This demonstrated the importance of social factors such as morale, group belonging, and management attention.

Key principles of the human relations approach include:

Focus on people rather than just processes -- recognising employees as individuals with social and emotional needs.

Motivation through recognition and belonging -- linking to theories such as Maslow's hierarchy of needs and Herzberg's motivators.

Leadership style matters -- supportive, participative leadership fosters engagement, unlike autocratic control.

Team dynamics are critical -- informal groups, communication patterns, and cooperation influence productivity.

Job satisfaction drives performance -- happy, respected employees are more productive and loyal.

Advantages of the human relations approach include higher employee engagement, improved morale, stronger teamwork, and reduced turnover. It recognises employees as assets rather than costs.

Disadvantages include the risk of overemphasising relationships at the expense of efficiency or results, and the possibility of managers manipulating employees through ''false concern.'' It can also be less effective in highly standardised, rule-bound environments where compliance is critical.

In procurement, the human relations approach may be applied by creating strong team cohesion, involving staff in decision-making, recognising contributions, and offering development opportunities. For example, involving buyers in supplier strategy discussions and giving recognition for successful negotiations can boost morale and performance.

In conclusion, the human relations approach recognises that people are motivated by social and psychological needs, not just financial incentives. It highlights the importance of communication, leadership, and teamwork in driving performance. While it should be balanced with attention to efficiency, it remains highly relevant for modern managers in creating motivated and productive teams.

The CIPS Code of Conduct sets out the ethical standards expected of procurement professionals. By adhering to this code, buyers are guided to remain impartial, transparent, and fair in all their decisions, ensuring that supplier selection and procurement practices are ethical and free from bias.

Firstly, the code requires professionals to act with integrity. This means avoiding conflicts of interest, declaring personal relationships with suppliers, and making decisions based on facts and evidence rather than personal preferences. For example, a buyer cannot award a contract to a supplier owned by a friend without declaring the relationship.

Secondly, the code emphasises transparency and fairness. Procurement professionals must ensure all suppliers are treated equally and given the same information during tendering processes. This prevents favouritism or hidden advantages for certain suppliers.

Thirdly, the code demands professional competence. This includes basing supplier decisions on objective evaluation criteria such as cost, quality, risk, and sustainability, rather than subjective or biased views. By applying standard evaluation models, professionals avoid unconscious bias.

Fourthly, the code promotes accountability. Procurement professionals are expected to keep proper records of decisions and provide audit trails. This reduces the opportunity for unethical practices such as bribery or corruption and ensures decisions can be justified.

Finally, the code supports sustainability and social responsibility. By considering environmental, ethical, and social factors in procurement, professionals act in the best interests of society and avoid discriminatory or exploitative practices.

Conclusion:

By following the CIPS Code of Conduct, procurement professionals remain unbiased by avoiding conflicts of interest, ensuring fairness, and using objective criteri

a. They also act ethically by maintaining transparency, accountability, and responsibility to wider society. This builds trust with stakeholders, improves supplier relationships, and protects the reputation of both the individual and their organisation.

Groups are an essential feature of organisational life. A group can be defined as two or more individuals who interact and work together to achieve a purpose. Groups may be formally created by management or may form informally through social interaction. There are several reasons why groups form in organisations.

The first reason is task and goal achievement. Formal groups are created to achieve organisational objectives that require collaboration. For example, in procurement, a cross-functional sourcing group may be formed to run a tender process involving operations, finance, and procurement staff. Individuals form these groups because working together helps them achieve outcomes that they could not accomplish alone.

The second reason is social and psychological needs. According to Maslow's hierarchy of needs, people seek belonging and relationships. Informal groups often form to meet these needs, providing friendship, support, and a sense of identity. In Star Fish Ltd, for instance, employees working remotely may form a social group using Teams or WhatsApp to stay connected and reduce feelings of isolation.

The third reason is safety and security. Groups can give members confidence and protection when facing uncertainty or change. For example, during organisational restructuring, employees may form informal groups to share information and support each other, making them feel less vulnerable. In procurement, staff may collaborate in groups to manage supplier risks or market volatility.

The fourth reason is power and influence. Groups provide individuals with a stronger collective voice. Trade unions are a formal example, but informal groups can also lobby management or resist unpopular changes. In procurement, buyers might form a group to influence senior managers on issues such as introducing sustainable sourcing practices. By forming groups, individuals can increase their bargaining power and impact decisions.

In conclusion, groups form for task achievement, to satisfy social needs, to provide security, and to increase power and influence. Managers must understand these dynamics because groups can both support organisational objectives and create challenges if informal groups resist change. Effective leaders harness the benefits of group formation while addressing the risks to ensure both cohesion and productivity.

Stakeholders can exert influence over procurement decisions in different ways. French and Raven identified five types of power that stakeholders may hold. Each has different implications for how procurement interacts with them.

1. Legitimate Power:

This comes from a stakeholder's formal position or authority. For example, a Finance Director may require procurement to comply with budgetary controls. Procurement must respect legitimate authority but can also influence decisions by providing evidence and business cases.

2. Reward Power:

This is based on the ability to provide benefits or incentives. For example, senior management may reward the procurement team with recognition or bonuses for achieving savings. Procurement can use this positively by demonstrating performance and aligning with organisational goals.

3. Coercive Power:

This is the power to punish or impose sanctions. For instance, a project manager may pressure procurement to prioritise their project by threatening escalation if deadlines are missed. Procurement must manage this carefully, balancing demands with fairness and compliance.

4. Expert Power:

This arises from specialist knowledge or skills. For example, a procurement professional with strong knowledge of supplier markets holds expert power, which can influence strategic decisions. Conversely, technical departments may hold expert power in specifying product requirements, requiring procurement to collaborate closely.

5. Referent Power:

This is based on personal relationships, respect, or charism

a. For example, a well-liked senior stakeholder may influence procurement decisions even without formal authority. Procurement must manage these situations by maintaining objectivity while leveraging strong relationships to gain support.

Comparison of Interaction with Procurement:

Legitimate power often requires compliance, while procurement may respond with process adherence and evidence-based justification.

Reward power creates motivation for procurement, but risks short-term focus if overused.

Coercive power can create conflict and stress; procurement must use negotiation and diplomacy to manage.

Expert power can be collaborative, as procurement and stakeholders share knowledge to improve outcomes.

Referent power relies on trust and relationships, which procurement can use to build coalitions and support for initiatives.

Conclusion:

The five types of power -- legitimate, reward, coercive, expert, and referent -- shape how stakeholders interact with procurement. Understanding these power bases enables procurement professionals to adapt their approach, whether through compliance, persuasion, collaboration, or relationship-building. This ensures stakeholder management supports both procurement objectives and organisational goals.

One widely used model for classifying stakeholders is Mendelow's Power-Interest Matrix. This model categorises stakeholders based on their level of power (ability to influence decisions) and their level of interest (degree of concern in the issue). It helps managers decide how to engage with different stakeholders effectively.

High Power / High Interest -- Key Players: These stakeholders must be closely managed and fully engaged. For example, the Finance Director or Hospital CEO when approving a high-value purchase. Procurement should provide detailed briefings, involve them in decision-making, and ensure their concerns are addressed.

High Power / Low Interest -- Keep Satisfied: These stakeholders can influence outcomes but may not have strong interest in day-to-day procurement. For instance, regulatory bodies or legal advisors. Procurement should provide concise updates and ensure compliance to avoid dissatisfaction.

Low Power / High Interest -- Keep Informed: These stakeholders care about the outcome but have limited influence. For example, end-users of medical equipment or nurses in a hospital setting. Procurement should communicate progress, seek feedback, and maintain transparency.

Low Power / Low Interest -- Minimal Effort: These stakeholders require only basic information. For example, general staff not directly impacted by a procurement decision. Simple updates or summaries are enough to keep them engaged.

When communicating about a high-value purchase, the Procurement Function should tailor its communication strategy according to this classification. Key players (high power, high interest) must be involved early with full transparency, including risk assessments and supplier evaluations. Stakeholders with high interest but low power should be consulted to build trust and buy-in, while those with high power but low interest should receive enough information to stay satisfied. Procurement should also ensure consistent, professional communication that reflects the importance of the purchase and builds confidence in the process.

Conclusion:

Mendelow's Power-Interest Matrix provides a structured way to classify stakeholders. By adapting communication to each category -- managing key players, keeping others satisfied or informed -- the Procurement Function ensures effective stakeholder engagement, minimises resistance, and gains approval for high-value purchases.