GRI ESRS-Professional Dumps - Pass ESRS Professional Certification Exam in First Attempt 2026

The sustainability statement under ESRS is structured according to ESRS 1 and ESRS 2, outlining specific disclosure requirements. The required disclosures include:

General Disclosure Requirements from ESRS 2

ESRS 2 outlines general disclosure requirements, including governance, strategy, and impact, risk, and opportunity management (IROs). These disclosures are mandatory for all undertakings, providing the foundation of the sustainability statement.

(A) is correct

Environmental Objectives under the EU Taxonomy Regulation

Companies must disclose their alignment with the EU Taxonomy Regulation, particularly under Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, which includes financial and non-financial companies' obligations regarding taxonomy-aligned activities.

(B) is correct

Financial Performance Metrics from IFRS Reports

Financial metrics from IFRS are NOT a required disclosure under ESRS. The sustainability statement focuses on non-financial reporting, while financial performance remains under IFRS standards in financial statements.

(C) is incorrect

Governance-Related Information Determined by the Materiality Assessment

Governance disclosures (ESRS G1 Business Conduct) include transparency about policies, risk management, and ethical business practices. The materiality assessment determines the necessary governance disclosures based on entity-specific risks and opportunities.

(D) is correct

Conclusion:

The sustainability statement must include general disclosure requirements (A), environmental objectives under the EU Taxonomy (B), and governance-related information based on materiality (D). Financial performance metrics from IFRS reports (C) are not required.

Official Reference:

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772

Compilation Explanations January - July 2024

A digital reporting platform under ESRS is designed to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of sustainability disclosures. It must enable seamless reporting and compliance monitoring through advanced digital features. The defining elements include:

(A) Structured data formats

Digital platforms must support structured formats like XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language), ensuring machine-readability and interoperability with financial reporting standards.

(C) Interactive dashboards

Platforms often provide visualization tools and dashboards to facilitate analysis and comparison of sustainability data across different periods and entities.

(D) Real-time updates and compliance tools

Digital reporting solutions should offer real-time data integration to enable ongoing compliance tracking and alignment with evolving regulatory requirements.

Incorrect Option:

(B) Manual data entry processes

Manual entry is not a characteristic of a digital reporting platform. Instead, digital platforms prioritize automation, integration, and structured data processing to improve efficiency and reduce errors.

Official Reference:

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, ESRS 1, Section 8.1 & 9.2 -- Establishes digitalization and connectivity requirements for sustainability reporting.

EFRAG Digital Reporting Guidelines (2024) -- Defines structured data standards and compliance automation in ESRS reporting.

The Environmental Section of the topical ESRS includes disclosure requirements covering environmental sustainability matters. This section specifically relates to environmental objectives as defined in the EU Taxonomy, ensuring alignment with broader European sustainability goals.

The topical ESRS environmental standards (ESRS E1 - E5) cover:

ESRS E1 -- Climate Change (Mitigation & Adaptation)

ESRS E2 -- Pollution

ESRS E3 -- Water and Marine Resources

ESRS E4 -- Biodiversity and Ecosystems

ESRS E5 -- Resource Use and Circular Economy

These standards align with the environmental objectives of the EU Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2020/852) and require organizations to report on their material environmental impacts, risks, and opportunities (IROs).

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A . Social impact and labor rights: Incorrect, as this belongs to the Social (S) section (ESRS S1 - S4).

B . Financial performance information: Incorrect, as this is part of financial reporting, not ESRS environmental disclosures.

D . Corporate governance and board diversity: Incorrect, as governance matters are covered under ESRS G1 Business Conduct.

Official Reference:

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772

Compilation Explanations January - November 2024

Under the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), organizations can leverage their ongoing dialogue with stakeholders for the materiality assessment. The ESRS explicitly acknowledges that stakeholder engagement plays a fundamental role in assessing material impacts, risks, and opportunities.

Stakeholder Engagement is Central to Materiality Assessment

ESRS 1 and ESRS 2 emphasize that organizations should integrate stakeholder perspectives into their materiality assessments. Engagement with affected stakeholders is central to the undertaking's ongoing due diligence process and sustainability materiality assessment. This includes processes to identify and assess actual and potential negative impacts, which inform the identification of material sustainability topics.

ESRS Does Not Mandate a Specific Stakeholder Engagement Approach

While stakeholder input is considered valuable, the ESRS does not prescribe a mandatory format or behavior for engagement. Companies have flexibility in determining how they engage with stakeholders.

IG 1 Materiality Assessment FAQ 15 states: 'The ESRS require disclosure on the materiality assessment and its outcomes but do not mandate specific behavior on stakeholder engagement or the due diligence process.'.

Stakeholders Can Provide Objective Evidence

The materiality assessment should be based as much as possible on objective data and evidence, but stakeholder perspectives can be a source of supporting evidence for impact materiality.

The relevance of stakeholder input depends on how much they are affected by an organization's activities (severity and likelihood of impacts).

Due Diligence and Materiality Assessment

The due diligence process includes stakeholder engagement, which informs the materiality assessment. Organizations must report how they integrate stakeholder feedback into identifying and assessing material issues.

Nature as a Silent Stakeholder

The ESRS even recognizes that ecological data and conservation indicators should be considered as proxy indicators for stakeholder engagement where human stakeholders are absent (e.g., in cases of biodiversity impact assessments).

Thus, the statement in the question is false. Organizations are encouraged to utilize their existing stakeholder engagement mechanisms to inform their materiality assessments under ESRS.

Official Reference:

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772.

Compilation Explanations January - November 2024.

ESRS 1 & 2 Guidelines on Double Materiality.

The goal of assurance in sustainability reporting is to confirm the reliability of sustainability disclosures, ensuring that reported information on risks, management strategies, and performance data is accurate and verifiable.

Key aspects of sustainability assurance include:

Evaluating the credibility of reported sustainability risks and how organizations manage them.

Assessing compliance with CSRD and ESRS assurance requirements.

Ensuring data integrity and alignment with financial and sustainability disclosures.

Enhancing investor confidence in an organization's sustainability reporting.

Official Reference:

CSRD and ESRS Assurance Requirements (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, Section 5.2) - Specifies assurance requirements for sustainability reporting.

EU Sustainable Finance Platform Report (2025) - Confirms assurance processes are necessary to enhance trust in sustainability data.