Most Recent Juniper JN0-636 Exam Dumps

According to the Juniper documentation, the steps to detect domain generation algorithms (DGA) on an SRX Series firewall are as follows:

Define a security-metadata-streaming policy under [edit services]. A security-metadata-streaming policy is a configuration that enables the SRX Series firewall to collect and stream security metadata, such as DNS queries and responses, to Juniper ATP Cloud for analysis.Juniper ATP Cloud uses machine learning models and known pre-computed DGA domain names to provide domain verdicts, which helps in-line blocking and sinkholing of DNS queries on SRX Series firewalls1. You can define a security-metadata-streaming policy by using the following command:

set services security-metadata-streaming policy

Attach the security-metadata-streaming policy to a security zone. A security zone is a logical grouping of interfaces that have similar security requirements. You can attach the security-metadata-streaming policy to a security zone by using the following command:

set security zones security-zone <zone-name> services security-metadata-streaming policy

The following steps are not required or incorrect:

Define an advanced-anti-malware policy under [edit services]. An advanced-anti-malware policy is a configuration that enables the SRX Series firewall to scan files for malware using Juniper ATP Cloud.It is not related to DGA detection2.

Attach the advanced-anti-malware policy to a security policy. A security policy is a configuration that defines the rules for permitting or denying traffic between security zones.It is not related to DGA detection3.

The flow-session resource is needed in order to ensure adequate and secure communication between the two logical systems.

The flow-session resource must be defined in the security profile for the interconnect logical system because the interconnect logical system is responsible for forwarding traffic between other logical systems. The flow-session resource determines the maximum number of sessions that the interconnect logical system can create and maintain.If the flow-session resource is not allocated or is insufficient, the interconnect logical system might drop packets or fail to establish sessions1.

The NAT resources are not needed to be allocated to the interconnect logical system because the interconnect logical system does not perform any NAT operations on the traffic.The NAT resources are only relevant for the logical systems that need to translate the source or destination IP addresses or ports of the traffic1.

No resources are not needed to be allocated to the interconnect logical system is incorrect because the interconnect logical system still requires some resources to function properly, such as the flow-session resource.The interconnect logical system cannot operate without any resources allocated to it1.

The resources must be calculated based on the amount of traffic that will flow between the logical systems is partially correct, but not the best answer. The resources must be calculated based on the amount of traffic and the type of traffic that will flow between the logical systems.For example, the flow-session resource depends on the number and duration of sessions, the security-log-stream-number resource depends on the number and size of logs, and the NAT resource depends on the number and type of NAT rules1.

Security Profiles for Logical Systems | Junos OS | Juniper Networks

The security feature that bypasses routing or switching lookup is transparent mode. The other options are incorrect because:

B) Secure wire is a feature that allows you to connect two interfaces on the same device and forward traffic between them without any processing.Secure wire does not bypass routing or switching lookup, but rather eliminates them altogether1.

C) Mixed mode is a mode of operation for SRX Series devices that allows you to configure both transparent mode and switching mode on the same device.Mixed mode does not bypass routing or switching lookup, but rather uses them depending on the interface type2.

D) MACsec (Media Access Control Security) is a feature that provides encryption and authentication for Layer 2 traffic.MACsec does not bypass routing or switching lookup, but rather operates at a lower layer3.

Therefore, the correct answer is

A) Transparent mode is a mode of operation for SRX Series devices that provides Layer 2 bridging capabilities with full security services. In transparent mode, the SRX Series device acts as a bridge between two network segments and inspects the packets without modifying the source or destination information in the IP packet header. The SRX Series device does not have an IP address in transparent mode, except for the management interface.Transparent mode bypasses routing or switching lookup, because the SRX Series device does not perform any routing or switching functions, but rather forwards the packets based on the MAC addresses4.

Secure Wire Overview

Mixed Mode Overview

MACsec Overview

Transparent Mode Overview

According to the Juniper documentation, the infected host score is a global setting that determines the minimum threat level required for a host to be considered infected and blocked by Juniper ATP Cloud. The infected host score can be configured from 1 to 10, where 1 is the lowest and 10 is the highest. The default infected host score is 5, which means that any host with a threat level of 5 or higher will be automatically blocked by Juniper ATP Cloud. However, the infected host score can be changed to a higher value, such as 6 or 7, to reduce the number of false positives and allow more traffic to pass through. In the exhibit, the host has a threat level of 5, which indicates that it is infected with malware and has attempted to contact command-and-control servers. However, some of the events have not been automatically mitigated, which means that the host has not been blocked by Juniper ATP Cloud. A possible reason for this behavior is that the infected host score is globally set above a threat level of 5, such as 6 or 7, which means that the host does not meet the minimum threshold for blocking. Therefore, the correct answer is C.The infected host score is globally set above a threat level of 5.Reference: [Configuring the Infected Host Score]1, [Compromised Hosts: More Information]2

1: https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/sky-atp/atp-cloud-user-guide/topics/task/sky-atp-infected-host-score.html2: https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/sky-atp/atp-cloud-user-guide/topics/concept/sky-atp-infected-host-overview.html

The exhibit shows the configuration of filter-based forwarding on an SRX Series device. Filter-based forwarding is a feature that allows the device to use firewall filters to direct traffic to different routing instances based on the match criteria. In this scenario, the device has two routing instances - ISP-1 and ISP-2 - and two firewall filters - FBF and FBF-ISP-1. The FBF filter is applied to the ge-0/0/1 interface as an input filter. The FBF filter has one term that matches the traffic from the 172.25.0.0/24 network and directs it to the ISP-1 routing instance. The ISP-1 routing instance has a static route to the next hop 172.20.0.2. The FBF-ISP-1 filter is applied to the ge-0/0/0 interface as an output filter. The FBF-ISP-1 filter has one term that matches the traffic to the 172.20.0.2 next hop and sets the forwarding class to expedited-forwarding.

The problem in this scenario is that the traffic from the other network (172.25.1.0/24) is not being forwarded to the upstream 172.21.0.2 neighbor. This is because the FBF filter does not have a term that accepts the traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network. The FBF filter only has one term that matches the traffic from the 172.25.0.0/24 network and directs it to the ISP-1 routing instance. The traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network does not match this term and is therefore discarded by the implicit deny action at the end of the filter. The traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network should be forwarded to the ISP-2 routing instance, which has a static default route to the next hop 172.21.0.2.

To solve this problem, you must add another term to the FBF filter to accept the traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network. This term should have the action accept, which means that the traffic will be forwarded according to the routing table of the master routing instance. The master routing instance has a static default route to the ISP-2 routing instance, which in turn has a static default route to the next hop 172.21.0.2. By adding this term, the traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network will be forwarded to the upstream 172.21.0.2 neighbor as expected.

The configuration of the new term in the FBF filter could look something like this:

[edit firewall family inet filter FBF] term 2 { from { source-address { 172.25.1.0/24; } } then { accept; } }