Most Recent Palo Alto Networks PSE-SWFW-Pro-24 Exam Dumps

Cloud NGFW for Azure and VM-Series share certain functionalities due to their common PAN-OS foundation.

Why A, C, and D are correct:

A . Panorama management: Both Cloud NGFW for Azure and VM-Series firewalls can be managed by Panorama, providing centralized management and policy enforcement.

C . Transparent inspection of private-to-private east-west traffic that preserves client source IP address: Both platforms support this type of inspection, which is crucial for security and visibility within Azure virtual networks.

D . Inter-VNet inspection through a transit VNet: Both can be deployed in a transit VNet architecture to inspect traffic between different virtual networks.

Why B and E are incorrect:

B . Inter-VNet inspection through Virtual WAN hub: While VM-Series can be integrated with Azure Virtual WAN, Cloud NGFW for Azure is directly integrated and doesn't require a separate transit VNet or hub for basic inter-VNet inspection. It uses Azure's native networking.

E . Use of routing intent policies to apply security policies: Routing intent is specific to Cloud NGFW for Azure's integration with Azure networking and is not a feature of VM-Series. VM-Series uses standard security policies and routing configurations within the VNet.

Palo Alto Networks Reference:

Cloud NGFW for Azure Documentation: This documentation details the architecture and integration with Azure networking.

VM-Series Deployment Guide for Azure: This guide covers deployment architectures, including transit VNet deployments.

Panorama Administrator's Guide: This guide explains how to manage both platforms using Panorama.

The question is about offline registration of a software NGFW (specifically VM-Series) when there's no internet connectivity.

A . Authcode and serial number of the VM-Series firewall: This is the correct answer. For offline registration, you need to generate an authorization code (authcode) from the Palo Alto Networks Customer Support Portal. This authcode is tied to the serial number of the VM-Series firewall. You provide both the authcode and the serial number to complete the offline registration process on the firewall itself.

Why other options are incorrect:

B . Hypervisor installation ID and software version: While the hypervisor and software version are relevant for the overall deployment, they are not the specific pieces of information required in the customer support portal for generating the authcode needed for offline registration.

C . Number of data plane and management plane interfaces: The number of interfaces is a configuration detail on the firewall itself and not information provided during the offline registration process in the support portal.

D . CPUID and UUID of the VM-Series firewall: While UUID is important for VM identification, it is not used for generating the authcode for offline registration. The CPUID is also not relevant in this context. The authcode is specifically linked to the serial number.

Automating VM-Series firewall deployment in public clouds is crucial for efficient and consistent deployments. Here's a breakdown of the options:

A . GitHub PaloAltoNetworks Terraform SWFW modules: This is a VALID method. Palo Alto Networks maintains Terraform modules on GitHub specifically designed for deploying VM-Series firewalls in various cloud environments (AWS, Azure, GCP). These modules provide pre-built configurations and best practices, simplifying and automating the infrastructure provisioning.

B . Deployment configuration in the public cloud Panorama plugins: While Panorama plugins enhance management and visibility, they don't directly automate the deployment of the VM-Series instances themselves in the cloud provider's infrastructure. Plugins primarily focus on post-deployment configuration, management, and monitoring. They rely on the instances being already deployed.

C . paloaltonetworks.panos Ansible collection: While Ansible is a powerful automation tool and the paloaltonetworks.panos collection allows for configuring and managing existing Palo Alto Networks devices, it's not the primary tool for deploying the VM-Series instances in the cloud. It's used for configuration after the instances are deployed.

D . panos Terraform provider: This is a VALID method. The Terraform provider for Palo Alto Networks firewalls (panos) allows for managing the configuration of the firewalls (like policies, objects, etc.) but also, importantly, can be used in conjunction with cloud provider Terraform providers (like aws, azurerm, google) to automate the entire deployment process, including the creation of the VM instances themselves.

Credit-based flexible licensing provides flexibility in deploying and managing Palo Alto Networks software firewalls. Let's analyze the options:

A . Create virtual Panoramas: While Panorama can manage software firewalls, credit-based licensing is primarily focused on the firewalls themselves (VM-Series, CN-Series, Cloud NGFW), not on Panorama. Panorama has its own licensing model.

B . Add Cloud-Delivered Security Services (CDSS) subscriptions to CN-Series firewalls: This is a VALID benefit. Credit-based licensing allows customers to use credits to enable CDSS subscriptions (like Threat Prevention, URL Filtering, WildFire) on CN-Series firewalls. This provides flexibility in choosing and applying security services as needed.

C . Create Cloud NGFWs: This is a VALID benefit. Cloud NGFW for AWS and Azure are licensed through a credit-based system. Customers consume credits based on usage.

D . Add Cloud-Delivered Security Services (CDSS) subscriptions to PA-Series firewalls: PA-Series firewalls are hardware appliances and use traditional licensing methods. Credit-based licensing is not applicable to them.

The question asks about Cloud NGFW management tasks performed inherently by the service within AWS and Azure. This means we are looking for tasks that are automated and handled by the Cloud NGFW service itself, not by the customer.

Here's a breakdown of why A, B, and C are correct and why D and E are incorrect, referencing relevant Palo Alto Networks documentation where possible (though specific, publicly accessible documentation on the inner workings of the managed service is limited, the principles are consistent with their general cloud and firewall offerings):

A . Horizontally scaling out to meet increased traffic demand: This is a core feature of cloud-native services. Cloud NGFW is designed to automatically scale its resources (compute, memory, etc.) based on traffic volume. This eliminates the need for manual intervention by the customer to provision or de-provision resources. This aligns with the general principles of cloud elasticity and autoscaling, which are fundamental to cloud-native services like Cloud NGFW. While explicit public documentation detailing the exact scaling mechanism is limited, it's a standard practice for cloud-based services and is implied in the general description of Cloud NGFW as a managed service.

B . Installing new content (applications and threats): Palo Alto Networks maintains the threat intelligence and application databases for Cloud NGFW. This means that updates to these databases, which are crucial for identifying and blocking threats, are automatically pushed to the service by Palo Alto Networks. Customers do not need to manually download or install these updates. This is consistent with how Palo Alto Networks manages its other security services, such as Threat Prevention and WildFire, where content updates are delivered automatically.

C . Installing new PAN-OS software updates: Just like content updates, PAN-OS software updates are also managed by Palo Alto Networks for Cloud NGFW. This ensures that the service is always running the latest and most secure version of the operating system. This removes the operational burden of managing software updates from the customer. This is a key advantage of a managed service.

D . Blocking high-risk S2C threats in accordance with SOC2 compliance: While Cloud NGFW does block threats, including server-to-client (S2C) threats, the management of this blocking is not inherently performed by the service in the context of SOC2 compliance. SOC2 is an auditing framework, and compliance is the customer's responsibility. The service provides the tools to achieve security controls, but demonstrating and maintaining compliance is the customer's task. The service does not inherently manage the compliance process itself.

E . Decrypting high-risk SSL traffic: While Cloud NGFW can decrypt SSL traffic for inspection (SSL Forward Proxy), the question asks about tasks inherently performed by the service. Decryption is a configurable option. Customers choose whether or not to enable SSL decryption. It is not something the service automatically does without explicit configuration. Therefore, it's not an inherent management task performed by the service.

In summary, horizontal scaling, content updates, and PAN-OS updates are all handled automatically by the Cloud NGFW service, making A, B, and C the correct answers. D and E involve customer configuration or compliance considerations, not inherent management tasks performed by the service itself.