Data-Architect Exam Dumps and Practice Questions

A data quality problem that could cause customers to be called by multiple Sales Reps is having duplicate Contact records in the system. Duplicate records can result from data entry errors, data imports, or integrations with other systems. Duplicate records can lead to confusion, inefficiency, and customer dissatisfaction

The issue that an architect will have when implementing the quarterly accounts receivable report in Salesforce is that Salesforce does not allow more than four objects in a single report type. A report type defines the set of records and fields available to a report based on the relationships between a primary object and up to four related objects. A report type has the following limitations:

It cannot include more than four objects in a single report type, which means that the report cannot compile data from five objects (Accounts, Contacts, Opportunities, Orders, and Order Line Items) at once.

It cannot include objects that are more than two relationships away from each other, which means that the report cannot access fields from Order Line Items through Opportunities and Orders.

It cannot include objects that have a many-to-many relationship with each other, which means that the report cannot access fields from Contacts and Opportunities through the junction object Opportunity Contact Role.

Using a declarative approach by installing and configuring Data.com Clean to monitor Account data quality can help UC meet their requirement. Data.com Clean can enrich and cleanse data on an ongoing basis by comparing Salesforce records with Data.com records and providing suggestions for updates. Data.com Clean can also provide dashboards and reports to monitor key data quality metrics such as match rate, field fill rate, and record completeness

According to the exam guide, one of the objectives is to 'describe best practices for implementing a single-org strategy in a B2C scenario'1. This implies that option D is the best practice for loading individual consumers as contacts in Salesforce. This approach avoids creating unnecessary accounts and reduces data duplication. Option C is not correct because it creates one account per contact, which increases data volume and complexity. Options A and B are not correct because they do not leverage the standard contact object, which provides native functionality and integration with other Salesforce features.

Leveraging Heroku Connect and Heroku Postgres, middleware tools, or Salesforce Connect and the cross-org adapter are all viable options to share data between Org A and Org B in near-real time3. Installing a 3rd party AppExchange tool may not provide bidirectional sync or may have additional costs. Developing an Apex class that pushes opportunity data between orgs daily via the Apex schedule may not meet the near-real time requirement.