Plat-Arch-201 Exam Dumps and Practice Questions

Using hard delete in Bulk API, identifying records that have not been modified or used in last 3 years, and archiving the records in EDW before deleting from Salesforce are all good recommendations to reduce the number of records from the org1.Using hard delete in batch Apex or Rest API may not be as efficient or scalable as Bulk API

According to the Salesforce documentation2, duplicate leads are leads that have the same or similar information as other leads in Salesforce. Duplicate leads can cause poor customer experience, higher costs, and inaccurate reporting. To mitigate the issues caused by duplicate leads, some of the recommended practices are:

Standardize lead information across all channels (option B). This means using consistent formats, values, and fields for capturing lead data from different sources, such as web forms, email campaigns, or third-party vendors. This can help reduce data quality issues and make it easier to identify and prevent duplicate leads.

Implement a third-party solution to clean and enrich lead data (option D). This means using an external service or tool that can validate, correct, update, and enhance lead data before or after importing it into Salesforce. This can help improve data quality and accuracy, and reduce duplicate leads.

Implement a de-duplication strategy to prevent duplicate leads (option E). This means using Salesforce features or custom solutions that can detect and block duplicate leads from being created or imported into Salesforce.For example, using Data.com Duplicate Management3, which allows defining matching rules and duplicate rules for leads and other objects.

Building a process to manually search and merge duplicates (option A) is not a good practice, as it can be time-consuming, error-prone, and inefficient. Building a custom solution to identify and merge duplicate leads (option C) is also not a good practice, as it can be complex, costly, and difficult to maintain. It is better to use existing Salesforce features or third-party solutions that can handle duplicate leads more effectively.

Using Weekly Export to extract transactional data to on-premise systems and using Event Monitoring to extract event data to on-premise systems are two recommended approaches that would address the security requirement of UC. Weekly Export is a built-in feature that allows UC to download a zip file of their Salesforce data on a weekly basis. Event Monitoring is a tool that allows UC to access detailed information about various events that occur in their Salesforce org, such as logins, logouts, file downloads, etc.

single-select restricted picklist with defined choices can be a way to configure customer type. The article states that picklists are fields that allow users to select one or more predefined values from a list, and restricted picklists ensure that users can only select from the defined values. This can help to limit the choices for customer type and ensure data quality.

According to Trailhead2, Customer 360 Data Manager is a feature that allows administrators to connect, reconcile, and share customer data across Salesforce orgs and external systems. Customer 360 Data Manager can sync product and pricing information from product master database to Salesforce using predefined mappings and rules, ensuring data quality and consistency. Option D is the correct answer because it suggests using Customer 360 Data Manager to sync product and pricing information from product master database to Salesforce. Option A is incorrect because building a custom integration for two-way sync of product and pricing information between product master and Salesforce can introduce data conflicts and duplication issues, as both systems can update the same data independently. Option B is incorrect because building a custom integration for one-way sync of product and pricing information from product master to Salesforce can be costly and time-consuming, as it requires custom development and maintenance. Option C is incorrect because implementing a manual process to update the products from an extract from the products master on a weekly basis can result in data latency and errors, as the products information may change more frequently than once a week.